6 minute guide

A worked 90/180 example with several Schengen stays

Follow three separate visits through a rolling-window check and see why exact ranges are more useful than a single total of days used.

Last updated:

Build the ledger first

Consider three completed stays: 1–10 January, 15–24 February, and 1–20 April. Because entry and exit dates both count, the stays use 10, 10, and 20 days. The completed ledger therefore contains 40 Schengen days, provided every range represents actual presence and no long-stay or residence-permit period has been mixed in.

Keep the ranges separate. The gaps are days outside Schengen and should not be counted. Country changes within Schengen would not create those gaps, but a genuine external-border exit does. This distinction is why a list of exact entries and exits is more reliable than a note saying “40 days used.”

Check a proposed May visit

Now propose a stay from 10 May through 29 May. It contains 20 days. On each proposed day, look back over that day and the previous 179 days. All 40 completed days remain recent enough to contribute, and the proposed days accumulate from one to 20. The running total reaches 60 on 29 May, so this example remains below the 90-day ceiling.

The conclusion is not “30 days remain forever.” It is only a statement about the windows tested for this itinerary. If more travel is added, or one historic exit was recorded a day late, the later totals change. The plan should be recalculated whenever the ledger changes.

Extend the plan toward the limit

If the traveller continues after 29 May, each additional present day adds to the total while the January dates remain inside the relevant windows. For these dates, 28 June reaches 90 days and 29 June is the first failing day at 91. Although January days then begin to leave the look-back window, new continuous-stay days initially replace them, so the traveller remains over the ceiling rather than gaining permission to continue. Every later date still needs its own rolling-window check.

A good planning view therefore reports more than one number. It should show the proposed day being tested, the start and end of its 180-day period, which completed and planned ranges intersect that period, and the first date that would fail. These details make it possible to compare the result with another calculator.

Ways this example can stop applying

This worked example assumes ordinary short-stay days under the shared Schengen rule. A visa sticker authorising fewer days, a long-stay visa, a residence permit, work rules, or a bilateral arrangement may require a different analysis. The calculation also does not prove that other border-entry conditions are satisfied.

Recreate your own dates rather than copying the answer from the example. Verify inclusive boundaries, preserve real absences, and compare important plans with the Commission calculator. If two tools disagree, inspect date formats and ranges first; do not choose whichever answer permits the longer trip.

  • 1–10 January: 10 days.
  • 15–24 February: 10 days.
  • 1–20 April: 20 days.
  • 10–29 May plan: 20 additional days in this example.

Official sources

Sources were checked on . Linked institutions may update their guidance after that date.

← Back to Roam Window